District of Columbia v. Heller:
. . . nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.
Banning firearms is not honest, nor is it honorable, nor is it in keeping with Constitutional rights.
If Naperville’s City Board would have grasped honesty and applied it to their decision, it would have reinforced the “conditions and qualifications” of sensible gun laws. Instead it went to the dark side. Banning honest people from exercising their civil and constitutional rights.
TR Ball
